Subject: FW: FW: Concorde Am: Reworked Numbers
From: "Bryan Kos" <[email-masked]>
To: "Paul Spreadbury" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:24:13 -0400

Read this on CA.

B

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked]
[mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:26 PM
To: Bryan Kos
Subject: Re: FW: Concorde Am: Reworked Numbers

Bryan,

We will arrive on Saturday at 1:45 PM on American Airlines flight 4141
coming from Chicago.  We will drive ourselves to the party.

See you then,

Mauricio

>
> From: "Bryan Kos" <[email-masked]>
> Date: 2004/06/30 Wed PM 12:04:39 EDT
> To: "MAURICIO" <[email-masked]>
> Subject: FW: Concorde Am: Reworked Numbers
>
> Hi Mauricio, are you cool with Andrews thoughts below? LMK,
>
> PS When do you get into Kalamazoo?
>
> Bryan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kline Andrew [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 11:28 AM
> To: Bryan Kos
> Cc: Tom Heysek
> Subject: Concorde Am: Reworked Numbers
>
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Here are my reworked numbers on Concorde. I think that they are more
> accurate than those given by Hartley, because they contain
staggard---month
> by month---placement throughout the years.
>
> In 2004, they won't receive the full amount (Hartley's) of Subcontract
> Shares because they are placing 25,000 workers per month. The placements
in
> Oct. through Dec., for example, won't get an extra subcontract share
because
> they haven't been there long enough(aside from the monthly $300, there are
> only 2 extra periods per year). Those Subcontract Shares payments will
> carry-over into 2005, etc...
>
> These numbers also include: 150K new placements in 2004, 250K new
placements
> in 2005, and 300K new placements in 2006. I think this is better modeling,
> because we must show that the business is growing, which it is!
>
> Andrew
>
>